USP <797> Compliance
- How Will USP 797 Affect Your Sterile
Compounding Operations?
- Compliance Dates Established
- A Controlled Environment is Required
for Compounding of CSPs
- Risk Levels Defined
- Beyond-Use Dating Limits Established
- Testing, Certification and Environment
Requirements
- Responsiblity of Compounding Personnel
Defined
- What Must be Done to be in Compliance
- What Liberty Industries Can Do to Help
How Will USP 797
Affect Your Sterile Compounding Operations?
Officially, USP 797 went into effect on January 1,
2004 and is the first standard affecting sterile compounding
which is enforceable by the FDA and state boards of pharmacy.
It is also important to note that the CDC, OSHA/NIOSH, JCAHO,
ASHP and ASPEN are supporting these standards, all with the
objective to improve the quality of sterile pharmaceuticals.
BACKGROUND: The primary purpose
for the creation of USP 797 was to reduce or prevent harm
to patients that could result from microbial contamination,
excessive bacterial endotoxins, large content error, and incorrect
ingredients or contamination of compounded sterile products.
A national survey was conducted in conjunction with ASHP
in 19911 in an effort to determine how pharmacies handled
sterile product preparations. The results showed a real diversity
in practices and many were clearly inadequate. This survey
lead to the first published Technical Assistance Bulletin
for Pharmacy-Prepared Sterile Products. Over the years more
publications have been released including ASHP’s Guidelines
on Quality Assurance for Pharmacy Prepared Sterile Products
and the USP’s Chapter 1206, Sterile Drug Products for
Home Use. Yet despite these efforts, the number of patients
hospitalized or killed by inappropriately prepared and often
contaminated sterile preparations compounded has increased.
Now
all compounding pharmacies in all fifty (50) states will feel
a direct and immediate impact as they prepare to comply with
USP 797 as USP 797 refers specifically to “…health
care institutions, pharmacies, physician’s practice
facilities and other facilities in which compounded sterile
preparations are prepared, stored and dispensed.” The
scope of the regulations has been broadened from home care
pharmacies to anyone in any practice setting, regardless of
discipline, who compounds sterile preparations. This includes,
not only injectable medications, but also biologics, diagnostics,
nutrients, radiopharmaceuticals, inhalations, irrigations
and ophthalmic and otic preparations. (back
to top)
COMPLIANCE
DATES ESTABLISHED: In broad terms, critical compliance
dates for all Compounding Pharmacies are as follows:
- July, 2004 – Should have begun the process of compliance
evaluation and formulated an initial action plan.
- January, 2005 – Should have conducted a risk assessment
of the facility’s compliance to all provisions of
this regulation.
- July, 2005 – Should have a renovation plan developed.
- January, 2006 – Should certify all laminar air flow
workbenches (LAFW), isolators and buffer rooms every six
(6) months.
Specific areas to consider for each phase of the process
have also been suggested as indicated in Table 12
|
Date
|
Compliance Area |
Details to Consider |
January, 2005
|
Reports/Documents |
- Adverse event reporting.
- Complaint procedures.
- Periodic review of quality control documents.
|
| Storage conditions and
beyond – use dating |
- Specific labeling requirements.
- Specific beyond-use dating policies, procedures
and requirements
|
Quality assurance practices
|
Visual confirmation of
personnel processes regarding gowning, etc. |
CSP work environment
|
Interim safety measures
required. |
Verification procedures
– personnel training and education
|
Initially and annually
thereafter:
- Didactic review
- Written testing
- Media-fill testing
|
Verification procedures
– environmental monitoring
|
- Certification of laminar
air flow workbench and barrier isolators every six
(6) months.
- Certification of the buffer room/zone
and anteroom/zone every six (6) months.
|
| July,
2005 |
Quality
assurance program
|
Formalized
in writing which describes specific monitoring and evaluation
activities. |
Maintaining
product quality and control once the CSP leaves the pharmacy
|
Packaging,
handling and transport.
- Policies and procedures including the packaging,
handling and transport of chemotixic/hazardous CSPs.
Use and storage.
Education/Training.
- Policies and procedures dealing with proper education
of patients and staff ensuring all of the above.
Administration.
- Policies and procedures dealing with such issues
as hand washing, aseptic techniques, site care, etc.
|
Finished
product – release checks and tests
|
Policies
and procedures that address the following:
- Physical inspections
- Compounding accuracy checks
- Sterility testing
- Pyrogen testing
- Potency testing
|
Equipment
|
Policies
and procedures that address calibration, routine maintenance,
personnel training |
Components
|
Policies
and procedures that address sterile components |
Processing:
Aseptic technique
|
Policies
and procedures that address specific training and performance
evaluation |
Environmental
control
|
Policies
and procedures that address the following:
- Cleaning and sanitizing the workspace
- Personnel and gowning
- Standard operating procedures
|
January, 2006
|
Quality assurance program
|
- Reporting and evaluating results
- Identification of follow-up activities when thresholds
are exceeded
- Delineation of individual responsibilities for each
aspect of the program
|
Quality assurance practices
|
- Quality testing of direct compounding environment
|
Verification procedures
– environmental monitoring
|
- Bacterial monitoring using an appropriate manner
|
(back to top)
A
CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT IS REQUIRED FOR COMPOUNDING OF CSPs:
Achieving and maintaining sterility and overall freedom
from contamination of a pharmaceutical product is dependent
upon the quality status of the components incorporated, the
process utilized, personnel performance and the environmental
conditions under which the process is performed.
USP 797 states that a Laminar Airflow Workbench (LAFW) and/or
a biological safety cabinet certified to ISO Class 5 for airborne
particles is required. This equipment must be placed within
an ISO Class 8 or better controlled environment which must
include an attached anteroom of the same air quality level.
The anteroom allows for movement of personnel and materials
in and out of the controlled environment.
An approved alternative is the use of a barrier isolator,
certified to ISO Class 5. A barrier isolator, in essence,
takes the place of the controlled environment by providing
controlled environment conditions within a contained workspace
of a smaller footprint. Although this device may be used outside
an ISO Class 8 environment, it is recommended that it also
be located in the ISO Class 8 environment.
Whether the decision is to install a controlled environment
or opt for a barrier isolator to be used external to a controlled
environment, the primary goal is safety. It is left up to
the individual pharmacy directors to make the best decision
for the future of their business, their personnel and their
patients.
A common means of achieving the required controlled environment
is to provide unidirectional airflow through High Efficiency
Particulate Air (HEPA) filters. The controlled environment
should also have temperature and humidity controls and have
a positive room air pressurization to keep ambient airborne
contamination from entering the area. Ceilings, walls, floors,
fixtures, and furnishings are to be constructed of materials
that can be easily cleaned using anti-microbial agents. All
surfaces should be smooth to avoid microbial growth.
(back to top)
| RISK
LEVELS DEFINED: USP 797 identifies three (3) types of
compounding risk levels: |
|
The risk levels are based on the potential for introducing
microbial, chemical or physical contamination during
compounding operations. These risk levels are then used
to help determine the required compounding conditions,
storage conditions, beyond-use dates and process validations
procedures. |
 |
| It is the responsibility of each compounding pharmacist
to make a risk-level determination, using professional
judgement and experience, according to each specific compounding
situation and conditions at the time, to both prepare
and dispense a compounded sterile preparation. The decision
must be based on maintaining the highest possible standards
of sterility and stability as indicated in the Table 2
below3. |
 |
|
RISK LEVEL
|
DESCRIPTION
|
EXAMPLES |
| LOW |
- The CSPs are compounded with aseptic manipulations
entirely within ISO Class 5 or better air quality
using only sterile ingredients, products, components
and devices.
|
- Single transfers of sterile dosage forms from ampuls,
bottles, bags and vials using sterile syringes with
sterile needles, other administration devices and
other sterile containers. The contents of ampuls require
sterile filtration to remove any glass particles.
|
- The compounding involves only transfer,
measuring and mixing manipulations with closed or
sealed packaging systems that are performed promptly
and attentively.
|
- Manually measuring and mixing no more
than three (3) manufactured products to compound drug
admixtures and nutritional solutions.
|
- Manipulations are limited to aseptically
opening ampuls penetrating sterile stoppers on vials
with sterile needles and syringes and transferring
sterile liquids in sterile syringes in sterile administration
devices and packages of other sterile products.
|
|
Medium
|
- Multiple individual or small doses of sterile products
are combined or pooled to prepare a CSP that will
be administered either to multiple patients or to
one patient on multiple occasions.
|
- Compounding of total parenteral nutrition fluids
using manual or automated devices during which there
are multiple injections, detachments and attachments
of nutrient source products to the device or machine
to deliver all nutritional components to a final sterile
container.
|
- The compounding process includes complex
aseptic manipulations other than the single-volume
transfers.
|
- Filling of reservoirs of injection and
infusion devices with multiple sterile drug products
and evacuation of air from those reservoirs before
the filled device is dispensed.
|
- The compounding process requires unusually
long duration, such as that required to complete dissolution
or homogenous aging.
|
- Filling of reservoirs of injection and
infusion devices with volumes of sterile drug solutions
that will be administered over several days at ambient
temperatures.
|
- The sterile CSPs do not contain broad-spectrum
bacteriostatic substances and they are administered
over several days (e.g., an externally worn or implanted
device.
|
- Transfer of volumes from multiple ampuls
or vials into a single final sterile container or
product.
|
| High |
- Nonsterile ingredients, including manufactured
products for routes of administration.
|
- Dissolving nonsterile bulk drug and nutrient powders
to make solutions which will be terminally sterilized.
|
- Sterile ingredients, components, devices
and mixtures are exposed to air quality inferior to
ISO Class 5. This includes storage in environments
inferior to ISO Class 5 of opened or partially used
packages of manufactured sterile products that lack
antimicrobial preservatives.
|
- Sterile ingredients, components, devices
and mixtures are exposed to air quality inferior to
ISO Class 5. This includes storage in environments
inferior to ISO Class 5 of opened or partially used
packages or manufactured sterile products that lack
antimicrobial preservatives.
|
- Nonsterile preparations are exposed for
at least six (6) hours before being sterilized.
|
- Measuring and mixing sterile ingredients
in nonsterile devices before sterilization is performed.
|
- It is assumed, and not verified by examination
of labeling and documentation from suppliers or by
direct determination, that the chemical purity and
content strength of ingredients meet their original
or compendial specifications in unopened or in opened
packages of bulk ingredients.
|
- Assuming, without appropriate evidence
or direct determination, that packages of bulk ingredients
contain at least 95% by weight of their active chemical
moiety and have not been contaminated or adulterated
between uses.
|
(back to top)
BEYOND-USE
DATING LIMITS ESTABLISHED: Two (2) factors are critical
in establishing beyond-use dating: (1) the chemical stability
of the chemical entity in solution and (2) the sterility of
the CSP which by definition is the absence of viable microorganisms
in the CSP.
Depending on the risk level assigned to the process, in the
absence of performing a sterility test, the following guidelines
have been established for beyond-use dating as illustrated
in Table 3.
Table
3 |
RISK LEVEL
|
ROOM TEMP |
REFRIGERATION |
FREEZER (= -20º C) |
LOW
|
48 HOURS
|
14 DAYS
|
45 DAYS |
| MEDIUM |
30 HOURS |
7 DAYS |
45 DAYS |
| HIGH |
24 HOURS |
3 DAYS |
45 DAYS |
If a sterility test is done following the methodology of
USP 71, the CSP can be assigned a date beyond-use dating based
on the maximum chemical stability of the of the drug in solution
as permitted by valid references.
(back to top)
TESTING,
CERTIFICATION AND ENVIRONMENT REQUIREMENTS (Table 4):
|
| ENVIRONMENT |
ISO CLASSIFICATION |
FREQUENCY OF TESTING |
| Laminar Airflow Workbench |
- ISO Class 5
- Certified for proper operation and located within
an ISO Class
|
Every six (6) months
or when moved |
Barrier
Isolator
|
- ISO Class 5
- Positive air pressure
- May be located outside an ISO Class 8 area
|
Every
six (6) months or when moved |
| Cleanroom |
- ISO Class 5 if sterile preparations are performed
without a barrier isolator or laminar air flow workbench.
- ISO Class 8 area and buffer zone where laminar
airflow workbench of biological safety cabinet is
located and used for sterile preparations.
- An ISO Class 8 ante room is required if high risk
preparations are prepared.
|
Every six (6) months
or when renovated |
| Biological
Safety Cabinet |
- ISO Class 5 if fused for sterile preparations.
- Must be certified for proper operation.
|
Every
six (6) months or when moved |
(back to top)
RESPONSIBILITY
OF COMPOUNDING PERSONNEL DEFINED: USP 797 states that
compounding personnel are responsible for ensuring that CSPs
are accurately identified measured, diluted and mixed in addition
to being correctly purified, sterilized, packaged, sealed,
labeled, stored, dispensed and distributed. Compounding personnel
are responsible for maintaining appropriate cleanliness and
providing labeling and supplementary instruction for the proper
clinical administration of CSPs4.
Qualified licensed health care supervisory personnel must
ensure that there is in place5:
- High standards for the quality and control of processes,
components and environments and for the skill and knowledge
of personnel who prepare CSPs.
- A written quality assurance procedure for the compounding
facility, including such items as accuracy and precision
in measuring, labeling accuracy and completeness, beyond-use
date assignment, methods of sterilization and purification,
safe limits and ranges for strength of ingredients.
- Established procedures for record keeping.
- Compounding personnel adequately skilled, educated, instructed
and trained to correctly perform and document the following
activities:
- Perform antiseptic hand cleansing and disinfection
of nonsterile compounding surfaces.
- Select and appropriately wear protective gloves,
goggles, gowns, masks, and hair and shoe covers.
- Use laminar flow clean-air hoods, barrier isolators
and other contamination control devices that are appropriate
for the risk level.
- Identify, weigh and measure ingredients.
- Manipulate sterile products, aseptically sterilized
high-risk level CSP’s, and label and quality inspect
CSPs.
(back to top)
WHAT
MUST BE DONE TO BE IN COMPLIANCE:
- Determine risk level as summarized in Table 2.
- Compare existing facilities, processes and procedures
with USP 797 requirements and assess differences; prioritize
the results.
- Develop a written action plan based on the prioritized
list. Refer to Table 1 for USP 797 specific date requirements.
- Communicate action plan to pharmacy staff.
- Document all measures of quality performance and communicate
improvements in USP 797 compliance with staff, administration
and accreditation organization.
(back to top)
WHAT LIBERTY
INDUSTRIES CAN DO TO HELP:
Over fifty years of experience has put LIBERTY on the leading
edge of today's cleanroom technology. If your requirements
are a little out of the ordinary, don't settle for someone
else's "pre-engineered" system that you have to
adapt to. LIBERTY adapts the cleanroom to your needs by designing
a custom cleanroom specifically to meet your requirements.
Simply provide us with the size and specifications required
for your project and we will fast track a custom engineered
unit to fit your specs. All rooms, whether hard wall or soft
wall, are built in accordance with the new cleanroom standard
- ISO 14644-1 (superceding Federal Standard 209E).
Liberty offers a variety of solutions to enable compliance
with the regulations no matter what the risk level.
(MISSING THIS PIC - USP7976.JPG)
The diagram on the left features a Class 5 cleanroom
with an integrated class 8 anteroom which provides a clean area
for donning gloves, gowns, etc. with a total footprint of 6'
x 8'.
Unit is supplied with lights, strip curtains and fan filter
units.
Liberty's
barrier isolator, pictured at the right, isolates areas from
various contamination sources including the volume of air
surrounding the equipment and the space from ceiling to floor.
A barrier isolator encompasses a much smaller area around
the process allowing a small volume and proper airflow and
totally removes workers’ contamination from the process.
Both systems have their benefits and drawbacks, but it is
up to the individual pharmacy directors to make the best decision
for their business, their personnel and their patients.
Call us today for a free evaluation of your pharmacy facilities
and let LIBERTY help you in your USP 797 compliance process.
(back to top)
|